|
| |
Nevada Retirement News
Public Employees Retirement System
Summer 2000
| Board Opposes Mandatory Defined Contribution Switch | Advantages of the Defined Benefit Approach | Retirement System Accepting Qualified Roll-Overs For Purchase Of Service Credit | Retirement Board Hires New Bond Manager |
Board Opposes Mandatory Defined Contribution Switch
Governor Guinn has, over the past 9 months, engaged in a fundamental review of State Government in which suggestions for improving State Government have come from many different sources. One collective source, the Nevada Taxpayers Association and the Chambers of Commerce suggested changing the Public Employees' Retirement System from a defined benefit (DB) program to a defined contribution (DC) program for all hires after a certain date.
The Retirement Board opposes such a conversion for a number of reasons.
- Defined contribution plans have inherent weaknesses as the core benefit for overall retirement security, especially in Nevada were public employees do not participate in Social Security;
- DC plans increase overall risk (investment and predictability) when compared to defined benefit plans;
- In a DC plan, employees are responsible for account management, making them subject to the whim of the market. Employees may see tremendous fluctuations in the value of their account over the course of their employment, and should they retire during a market down period, their account will be diminished in value. They cannot counteract this potential timing issue and have no ability to regain some of the value of the retirement savings after retirement, as cost of living adjustments are not typically available in a DC plan. This represents a significant risk to an employee's retirement security;
- Lump sum distributions, as a key feature of defined contribution plans often result in retirement monies being used for other purposes, thus reducing overall retirement savings for our members;
- PERS is a well-managed, stable fund providing a reasonable base income for our members in retirement at a cost-effective price;
- DC plans may actually have higher administrative costs than comparable DB plans. Instead of directly itemizing and identifying these large DC plan expenses, they are hidden in the return that the participants receive on their investments, making it difficult to determine whether they are reasonable.
Advantages of the Defined Benefit Approach
Defined benefit pension programs, like PERS, provide significantly more comprehensive benefits than defined contribution plans. Early retirement, disability benefits and post retirement increases are not normally available in a DC plan, but are part of a defined benefit program.
The amount of benefit in a defined contribution plan rests solely with the account balance and therefore, is subject to the whims of the market at the time of retirement. No minimum benefit can be determined.
Defined benefit programs offer guaranteed benefits, regardless of investment income. The employee under a DB plan knows what their income will be in retirement. DB programs offer comprehensive benefit packages including beneficiary protection and post retirement increases. Post retirement increases help protect against inflation's effect on fixed income. During active employment the benefit is also inflation protected because of salary increases experienced by the employee over their career. Additionally, employers and the general public receive the benefit of the training and experience an employee receives over the course of their career, because PERS encourages longevity in the public workforce.
In our efforts to protect your benefits, the Retirement Board adopted the following Board Resolution on August 16th 2000:
Whereas, efforts to convert state and local government retirement plans from defined benefit to defined contribution have taken place; and
Whereas, state and local government employees traditionally participate in defined benefit plans that provide a pension benefit based on the employee's length of service and salary at retirement; and
Whereas, some state and local government employees have in addition to defined benefit plan coverage a supplemental defined contribution plan, such as a Section 403(b) tax sheltered annuity, a Section 457 deferred compensation plan, or a Section 401(k) plan, in which they may voluntarily participate; and
Whereas, Nevada PERS' defined benefit plan helps to attract and retain productive employees, which helps produce a high performance work force for taxpayers; and
Whereas, Nevada PERS' plan provides employees with an effective means of building retirement income; and
Whereas, Nevada PERS offers a predictable lifetime retirement benefit that can never be reduced; and
Whereas, Nevada PERS is a long-term investor and averages the bad periods against the good, therefore, the amount of a retiree's benefit is not reliant on the health of the stock market as could be the case with defined contribution plans; and
Whereas, Nevada PERS' plan offers plan participants the opportunity to purchase service credit which affords portability; and
Whereas, the funding policy of Nevada PERS is intended to produce relatively level rates of funding that will accumulate sufficient assets to meet the cost of promised benefits; and
Whereas, Nevada PERS is reviewing plan modifications to address the issue of short service employees and to enhance portability within the structure of the existing defined benefit plan; now therefore be it
Resolved that the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System of Nevada supports the defined benefit plan structure as the primary retirement plan for public employees in the State of Nevada and supports employer offered voluntary defined contribution plans as supplemental retirement savings programs.
We will keep our members and beneficiaries updated as to the status of this issue, as we move closer to the legislative session.
What is a Defined Contribution (DC) Plan?
- DC plans define the employer contributions to the plan
- There is no benefit guarantee
- Employees bear all investment risk
- Benefit based on contribution + investment return - administrative costs
- Typically DC plans do not include survivor benefits or disability benefits
- No cost of living adjustments after retirement are typically granted
|
What is a Defined Benefit (DB) Plan?
- PERS' current program in which your benefit is based upon a statutory formula is a defined benefit plan (years of service X 2.5 X average compensation)
- Individuals do not bear the investment risk regardless of return, your benefit is guaranteed
- DB plans include survivor and disability benefits
- Cost of living adjustments after retirement are part of the benefit
|
Retirement System Accepting Qualified Roll-Overs
For Purchase Of Service Credit
In the 1999 legislative session the Retirement Act was amended to include language allowing members to roll money into the Retirement System on a tax deferred basis for the purchase of service credit, provided that the money met the qualifications under the Internal Revenue Code. The statute provides that any member may use:
- All or any portion of the balance of the members interest in a qualified trust pursuant to section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code or
- The money contained in an individual retirement account (IRA) the entire amount of which is:
- From a retirement plan that is qualified under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 401(a) and is exempt from taxation under IRC section 501(a) or annuity contract described in IRC section 403(a)
- The amount must be an eligible rollover defined in IRC section 402(c)(4)
- The amount distributed must be rolled over into an individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity, as those terms are defined in IRC section 408(a) and (b)
- The entire amount in the individual retirement account or individual retirement annuity (IRA) must consist only of the monies rolled over from the qualified plan, plus income earned on that amount while it is held in the IRA, for the entire time the money is held in the conduit IRA. A conduit IRA cannot receive money from any other source, such as another IRA or individual contributions from the owner of the IRA or deductible contributions from the qualified plan.
The Internal Revenue Code limits rollovers from IRAs to those from what is called a "conduit IRA" meaning the source of the funds in these accounts come from some qualified source and cannot be mingled with other funds. If members are interested in pursuing purchases of service using qualified funds, contact PERS for the appropriate forms.
Retirement Board Hires New Bond Manager
The Public Employees' Retirement Board recently selected Lincoln Capital Management (Chicago) to oversee a U.S. bond index fund for the System. A 1999 review of our fixed income structure determined that adding an index component to PERS' U.S. bond portfolio reduces benchmark risk and management expense. The new fixed income structure includes a 25% allocation to a Lehman Aggregate Index fund and 75% to active core fixed income management.
Our benchmark in the U.S. bond portfolio is the Lehman Aggregate Index. It consists of over 5,600 securities, including any publicly issued, U.S. dollar taxable bond with an investment grade rating and an issue size over $150 million. As a result, the Lehman Aggregate is a good proxy for U.S. bond market performance. The makeup of the index is described in Exhibit 1. The sectors include:
- Treasuries bonds issued by the U.S. Government.
- Mortgages bonds backed by home mortgage payments.
- Corporates debt obligations issued by corporations.
- CMBS commercial mortgage backed securities, backed by commercial real estate loans.
- Agencies bonds issued by agencies of the U.S. Government.
- Asset Backed securities backed by credit card loans, auto loans, etc.
The Board's search process entails significant screening and due diligence reviews by staff and the Board's investment consultant, Callan Associates, Inc. Some of the items reviewed during this process include:
- Manager investment style and process The systems, personnel and investment philosophy employed by the firm.
- Amount of assets under management To ensure compliance with the Boards manager diversification policies.
- Investment performance and risk criteria To determine the most competitive risk/return track records in the candidate group.
- Organizational stability A key component in maintaining a firms successful track record.
This work culminates in the selection of interview candidates. For this search, the Board interviewed four finalists.
Lincoln was established in 1967 and currently oversees $21 billion in bond index assets. They are a private, 100% employee owned firm whose only business is institutional investment management. Lincoln has managed Lehman Aggregate Index assets for 14 years utilizing an optimization strategy. Since it is nearly impossible to purchase all 5,600 bonds in the index, Lincoln uses proprietary computer tools to select bonds that are most representative of the benchmark as a whole. Their 14-year track record supports the success of this investment process.
The Board is looking forward to a successful long-term relationship with Lincoln Capital.
|